data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/255f6/255f609f2cdb8c29d024366d247d16bed57b5042" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/255f6/255f609f2cdb8c29d024366d247d16bed57b5042" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/255f6/255f609f2cdb8c29d024366d247d16bed57b5042" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c612/9c612c8d3dbf2823f3a624a7071fd52c49ecb50e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffe50/ffe5037b821e097ffccd04241aa8bf629765947b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/255f6/255f609f2cdb8c29d024366d247d16bed57b5042" alt=""
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/255f6/255f609f2cdb8c29d024366d247d16bed57b5042" alt=""
|
Going back, going places
Wisden CricInfo staff - November 21, 2002
If Michael Vaughan has a signature stroke it is the cover-drive, but his 177 at Adelaide owed more to his back-foot play. As our graph shows, Vaughan scored a much higher proportion of his runs off back foot than front. That included three searing pulls for six, two off Andy Bichel and one off Shane Warne, and a number of forcing shots through the covers.
Vaughan had a different plan for each bowler, and he only really unfurled his trademark urgent drive for McGrath. He went back to only a third of his deliveries from McGrath (29 out of 87); for Bichel and Jason Gillespie that figure was 46% and 51% respectively. Yet he when played back to McGrath, Vaughan was most productive: he managed 20 off 29 balls, as opposed to 21 off 43 off the front foot.
© Wisden CricInfo Ltd
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/255f6/255f609f2cdb8c29d024366d247d16bed57b5042" alt=""
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/255f6/255f609f2cdb8c29d024366d247d16bed57b5042" alt=""
|