I'm not a complete player, says Dravid
30 May 2001
He is one of the select few with a Test batting average of over 50 but
Rahul Dravid insists that he is not a complete batsman.
In 43 Test matches, he has hit a double century and eight other
hundreds in scoring 3660 runs at an average of 53.82. In one-day
internationals he averages 36.76 with seven hundreds.
Yet, the Indian vice-captain said today he was far from perfect and
was constantly evaluating his performances and bringing changes in his
techniques.
"I know I am not a complete player. I know that for a fact. You keep
learning along the way. You learn every day. You try to grasp and may
be try to put a few of those things in your game," Dravid said in an
interview to PTI in Mutare.
And because, he was not a perfect batsman, Dravid said, he welcomed
healthy criticism.
"I am willing to listen to the criticism, look at it. If I feel it
works for me, it makes sense for me, I would do something about it. If
I feel it doesn't make any sense, and somebody is criticising just for
the sake of criticising, I can forget about it. I have the ability not
to think about it," he said.
But Dravid, who is known to keep his cool under duress and who tries
"to remain as controversy-free as possible" admitted that sometimes
things go beyond his control and he has reacted to criticism or
sledging by opposition teams.
"There have been moments (when I have lost my cool) but generally I
can keep things under control on a cricket field."
And though he did not mention it, the whole world saw his outburst
after completing his century against Australia in that memorable Test
at Kolkata where he waved his bat in anger towards the press box
seeking to dispel their doubts over his ability to score at a brisk
pace.
Slow scoring is a charge that has been associated with Dravid many a
time, but the stylish Karnataka batsman countered this saying his pace
of scoring really depended on the requirement of the team and his own
form.
"Cricket is all about confidence and form. Batsmen in good form will
tend to play a lot of shots. I think it (scoring at a slow pace) is
just an illusion. When I am out of form and not getting runs people
must have felt so. But it happens to any batsmen.
"It also depends on the kind of role you are playing and the situation
you are in. When the situation calls for domination, I would like to
do that but if it calls for staying in the middle, I must go for it.
I have played a lot at the number three position. There your job is to
hold your end and ensure that you don't lose too many early wickets to
the new ball. Now that I am batting lower down the order, it may give
me a little more opportunity to play a bit more shots."
He did not agree with a suggestion that he would have been more
aggressive had he been playing for a side stronger than India. "I
personally feel we have got a good side. The fact that I play in the
same side as (Sachin) Tendulkar, (Sourav) Ganguly and (VVS) Laxman
gives me a lot of confidence. It takes a lot of pressure off me.
Instead of being a deterrent, I think it (playing for India) has
helped me and inspired me to play better," he said.
Dravid said playing with a straight bat was one of his biggest
strengths and he was taught at a very young age to do so by none other
than the great Gundappa Viswanath.
"While playing in the Ranji Trophy, he (Viswanath) told me never to
use my pads to play against spinners. All good players of spin
actually use their bats. You would never see a Sachin Tendulkar use
his pads. Or Brian Lara."
The ability to concentrate for a long time was another of his strong
points which again he learnt at a very young age. "I have enjoyed
being at the wicket for long periods of time. This is something I have
developed over the years. I concentrate well and do not throw away my
wicket when things are going good. If I get set I try to make it a big
one."
Dravid, who has an excellent record against Zimbabwe with three
centuries in as many Tests, had an explanation for India's relatively
poor performance on foreign soil.
"I think we find the conditions on and off the field not to our
liking. Maybe we don't adjust to it. But then there are not many teams
who win abroad."
Dravid has taken some outstanding catches at forward short leg but
said he was not a natural fielder at that position and had worked very
hard to improve.
"Once I knew I would be fielding in that position for some time, I
worked at it, took a lot of catches and sort of improved as I went
along. I have enjoyed fielding close-in. You tend to concentrate
harder. Concentrating and being a part of the game for long periods
are my strengths."
On his duel with leg-spinner Shane Warne, Dravid said it had always
been very interesting and he enjoyed the see-saw battle with the
Aussie.
"I have played 10 Tests against him. He has got me out a few times but
I also have enjoyed success against him. I scored a lot of runs
against him playing for Kent on a real turner of a wicket. It was very
satisfying."
Dravid denied he had been instrumental in getting John Wright, who was
his coach at Kent, appointed as coach of the Indian team. "It was the
Board's decision to go in for foreign coaches. They just asked me how
it was like working with him (Wright) for six months. This was in
Nairobi (in October, 2000) when he had already been appointed. To say
I was instrumental in his appointment is a fallacy."
Perfect or not, Dravid is happy and satisfied with his performance and
not unaware of his worth in the team. "I have done quite well in the
43 Test matches. I have got a very good record home and away and I
have always done my best. I know in my heart that I have always given
my best. I work very hard. I focus very hard. It is very satisfying to
know that I am giving my best to the team. And then my record at the
end of the day.... I mean that is the most important thing."
© PTI