THE CAPTAIN'S VIEW -- ZIMBABWE IN SHARJAH
Alistair Campbell talks to John Ward
13 January 1999
John Ward has interviewed Alistair Campbell about Zimbabwe's
recent cricket tours of Sharjah and Pakistan. Here he presents
some of the national captain's thoughts on the trip to Sharjah,
where Zimbabwe reached the final of a major international
competition for the first time. We travelled economy class to
Sharjah, via South Africa and Dubai, arriving in the early hours
of the morning. We stayed at a very good hotel in Dubai, and
we travelled about twenty minutes to the ground in Sharjah every
day. Sharjah is a separate Arab emirate, but there are no
passport controls or problems crossing the border between the
countries . There is a big shopping complex and food court in
Dubai, with a subway and a McDonald's, and we used to enjoy going
for a walk there in the little free time we had. It was very
expensive, though. We get a bit tired of meals in the hotel
after a while, so the guys were able to go out and have a few
beers and get a hamburger on the way back.
I think we ate all the lamb chops in Dubai as well! We had them
for breakfast, and the guys really enjoyed them. The hotel grew
quite irritated as there weren't enough for their other guests
after we had finished with them! Adam Huckle and Andrew Whittall
used to have about 15 each for breakfast!
We had a bus driver called Kamran who used to take us in every
day. When I got in the bus before the first match, he grabbed my
little finger, shook it and spat on it. I asked him what he was
doing, and he replied, ``Inshallah (by the grace of God) you will
win today.'' He did the same every game we played. He phoned me
in Pakistan and did the same over the phone -- and we won a Test
match, so maybe we should get him here more often!
For the first time we were playing there under day-night
conditions, which was a very good experience for us. It was very
well organised, as these tournaments are.
It is called the Cricketers' Fund Benefit Series, and is played
for the benefit mainly of former players from the Indian
subcontinent, but also for others from outside who have achieved
great things, such as Allan Border and Viv Richards. They really
try to look after those who have made contributions to the game,
as well as the teams participating.
We had a few days to practise, as the first match was between
India and Sri Lanka. After that it was a pretty hectic schedule;
players need a couple of days' break playing day-night cricket in
between matches, but we played our five matches in a period of
seven days.
They have very good facilities there and the ground is in
magnificent condition. The square has full grass cover, but the
pitches are shaved until they are basically rolled mud. After a
lot of rolling it gets a shine to it, so the pitches are pretty
unique. Two pitches were prepared for this tournament, one
markedly better for batting than the other.
First Match: Sri Lanka 196 (De Silva 55, Mahanama 51; Brandes 3/19,
Evans 3/11) lost to Zimbabwe 197/3 (G Flower 87*, Goodwin 54) by
seven wickets.
We talked about our game plan, which was to try to unsettle them
as much as we could with our tactics. We planned to put them in
to bat if we won the toss, as they prefer to chase targets, and
that is what happened. We got off to a great start. Eddo Brandes
bowled particularly well, really straight at a good pace; they
didn't move their feet and he got three lbw decisions. We got
amongst them early. Aravinda de Silva played reasonably well but
didn't really look in touch. Craig Evans kept on saying he was
the best 'death' bowler in the world, so I tested him out and he
didn't let me down.
Their 196 was not a very good score, and after a slight hiccup,
losing two wickets for 31, Grant Flower and Murray Goodwin played
particularly well before Andy Flower came in and finished it off.
It was good to win after the disappointment of losing to New
Zealand in Bangladesh.
Had we won that, I feel we could have beaten Sri Lanka in the
next match and won through to the semi-finals. They looked a bit
out of touch, their batsmen out of form and their bowlers pretty
tired. I think they had had too much cricket and needed a break.
I don't think they were too well prepared, to be honest; they
had had a lot of rain in Sri Lanka and had only been able to have
indoor nets.
Be that as it may, we still beat the world champions, and it was
a very good start to the tournament. We wanted to win at least
one more game after this and get into the final by virtue of our
victories, not just on run rate.
There were articles in the press about low morale in the Sri
Lankan camp. We did get that impression: Muralitharan wasn't
playing for them due to injury, which knocked a lot of stuffing
out of them, and also when people like de Silva and Ranatunga are
not scoring runs. It's important to their success that they are
firing, which in the last couple of years they have been, and
they have been the mainstay of the batting. Also Jayasuriya has
been giving them magnificent starts, and the poor form of these
key batsmen really knocks the wind out of their sails.
But a lot of accusations that have nothing to do with cricket get
levelled at teams when they win the World Cup and then go through
a bad run; that's the sort of criticism they have to bear. I
don't think they were the same quality side that we played
against in the past, but everybody has bad runs. They are good
enough players to pick themselves up, get out of this rut and
start playing good one-day cricket again.
Second Match: Zimbabwe
196 (Streak 59) lost to India 197/3 (Tendulkar 118*; Strang 3/32)
by seven wickets.
We didn't distinguish ourselves in this match
and were in poor shape at 83 for six at one stage. Then Streaky
showed what a capable all-rounder he can be with 59, ably
assisted by Wishart, and then Strangy and Eddo at the end of the
innings. This was the better batting pitch, so 196 was not a
very good performance.
Tendulkar batted magnificently and we were outplayed, so it
wasn't a night to remember. We had a bad game, but we remembered
that we were generally playing good enough cricket, and when
Tendulkar gets going most sides have suffered when they thought
they had a chance. Basically, though, our batting let us
down.
Third Match: Zimbabwe 259/7 (Johnson 72, A Flower 95;
Wickremasinghe 3/28) beat Sri Lanka 235 (Tillakaratne 72*; Strang
4/32) by 24 runs.
We knew that our best chance of winning the one
further game we needed was against Sri Lanka, as India were
playing pretty well and they had beaten Sri Lanka twice.
We were put in to bat, but didn't get the best of starts at 24
for three. We talked to ourselves, realised that we were playing
on a decent pitch and had a lot of batting, and just needed to
build a partnership. Neil Johnson and Andy Flower played
magnificently, running the ball round in the middle, and the
score picked up at the end when Eddo hit 28 off 22 balls. We
thought we might be ten runs or so shy of a good total, but also
realised that if we could put their batting under some pressure
and field like tigers, we could do things. We had them 103 for
six through some great bowling.
Paul Strang had a magnificent tournament and this game was no
exception. The others all chipped in; Tillakaratne played really
well at the end, helped by Dharmasena, but they needed 16 an over
off the last four overs and we knew that if we just bowled with
discipline we were home. This victory secured our place in the
final and the guys were understandably delighted.
Fourth Match: Zimbabwe 205/7 (Campbell 83*) beat India 192
(Olonga 4/46) by 13 runs.
This match was a bit of an anti-climax, coming before the final,
and nobody really wanted to play it; we felt we needed a break
for some quality practice and preparation for the final. But we
had to step out and play on that pitch that wasn't so good, and
managed to scrape home. We changed the batting order a bit, and
gave Brandes, Strang and Streak a rest, as they were our
potential match-winners with the final coming up. We put Wishart
up the order as he hadn't been getting a knock, but he was very
unlucky: Grant straight-drove back down the pitch and the ball
hit the bowler's finger-tips and then the stumps with Craig
backing up. At 65 for five, this was hardly the best of starts.
But I was batting at number six and managed to get a few. Gavin
Rennie and Andrew Whittall batted really well with me and we
managed to put on a good number of runs for the sixth and seventh
wickets.
We realised that 200 on that pitch was a score we could defend,
but we still had to bowl and field well and hold our catches.
Henry Olonga bowled very straight and quick; he had Tendulkar
caught behind off a no-ball, and the next ball fending off his
nose to be caught in the gully; and Ganguly lbw first ball. They
didn't look comfortable against him, and this knocked the
stuffing out of their batting.
There was some great fielding, including three run-outs, by
Olonga and two by Grant Flower, and some tidy bowling by the
others to back up Henry. It just goes to show that, even if we
rest what is supposedly our first-string bowling side and give
guys like Olonga, Mbangwa and Huckle a crack, they can do just as
good a job.
It was particularly gratifying to be able to beat Sri Lanka and
India in what is virtually their own back yard, where they are
pretty formidable opponents.
Final: Zimbabwe 196/9 (Strang 46; Srinath 3/40) lost to India
197/0 (Ganguly 63*, Tendulkar 124*) by ten wickets.
Again our batting did not get off to a good start. Paul Strang
and Brandes tried to rescue us after being 81 for six, but 196 on
that good pitch was never going to be enough.
We dropped Tendulkar off a skied catch which went straight up in
the air, through a bit of a misunderstanding between Strangy and
Andy Flower. He had about 60-odd, so this just compounded the
issue. We knew we hadn't scored enough and were totally
out-played.
Maybe it was lack of experience in playing in a final, maybe
pressure got to the guys -- but obviously the more finals we
play, the better we learn how to play in them. We now know the
emotions we went through before the match, we know what we did
wrong in the middle, and what we need to correct next time. So
next time we get to a final I'm sure we'll give a better account
of ourselves.
But, to sum up the whole tournament, we have to say that to beat
India and to beat Sri Lanka twice at Sharjah is some achievement.
We were very happy with the way we played, but just disappointed
with the end result.
We did have an enjoyable ending to our tour. There are a lot of
expatriate Zimbabweans living in Dubai, and a couple called the
Kidsons organised a braai for us on the beach on the last night,
as they did the last time we were there. They live in a sort of
expatriate compound right by the beach. An interesting
development was taking place right where we were. Gambling is
illegal in Dubai, so they are getting around it by building a
huge casino hotel about fifty metres into the sea, so it's
off-shore!
We went for a swim, had some beers, watched the sun set, and they
brought out all the chicken with stuffing and all the trimmings,
etcetera -- they really laid it on. But before that, with all
the matches so close together and so few rest days, we were
really knackered.
On the off days, the guys would get on the bus and go to do some
shopping, visiting the sports shops and doing other bits and
pieces. But it was too congested a tour to go out and explore
Dubai.
Next article: Alistair Campbell talks about the tour to Pakistan.
|