Same old villains with new images
Trevor Chesterfield
30 December 1998
CAPE TOWN (South Africa) - Twenty summers ago the villains in the game
as we rushed toward the 1980s were the left overs from Kerry Packer's
wallet and the Australian Cricket Board with such things as
match-fixing, taking money from bookies and cover-up of details still
part of the doubting finger of fate unsure in which direction to
point.
The ABC have, somehow, still managed to hold down the image of being a
chauvinistic secret society after their belated revelations how Shane
Warne and Mark Waugh collected money from bookies to pass on such hot
tips as ground and pitch conditions and weather reports.
Perhaps, however, the ACB are more convincing villains by finally
admitting to the cover up, while their fining of Warne and Warne is a
light weight matter compared to what normally comes from their offices
at that vast building known as the MCG.
Well, 20 years ago, whether Packer is, or was, a creep was no longer
the real issue; he had succeeded in winning the ACB contract and his
commercial panjandrums were making a mint out of the game. What was
starting to count was how the issue of the new-age professionalism on
a word-wide basis, and the release of player power were powerful
interacting forces. The bigger bucks was becoming more important.
Brian Lara's West Indies side, split as it was at the start of the
tour of South Africa over the industrial action for a better deal, is
one of the many areas where player power has been used to create an
image of strength, when in fact it is one where some players have
benefitted at the expense of others.
Naturally there are different opinions about the upwardly mobile
forces which have governed our lives since May 1994.
If, say, John Arlott was right when he wrote in the mid-1960s that
changes in the game reflected changes in society then our recent
social blessings have indeed been mixed. This does not mean that those
in the ICC, Pakistan Cricket Board, ACB or UCB for that matter should
be allowed to shuffle their moral responsibility and compromise the
game because some guys earned a few extra dollars by being asked to
hand over information which could have been collected from weather
reports and keeping an eye on newspaper reports.
What we have here is that the sub-continental powers want to take some
heat out of their own inquisition by placing focus on a new area of
discontent. And banning players is not going to help; whether is for
two or five years or life. It's a bit like rearranging the deck chairs
on the Titanic as it started to sink.
Pakistan, whether they like it or not, have long given the impression
of crying wolf as the administration in that country fails to sort out
a simple problem of the truth over match fixing claims, many of which
are being substantiated.
The on-going probe into the match-fixing claims is still the stop
story in the game during 1998 and will spill over to 1999. Another
issue is the Windies industrial action and what can be learnt from
such disruptions of tour programmes. Certainly the way they have
played and the results acheived they should rather pay the extra cash
to help their own development schemes.
Perhapas Arlott is right and the backstabbing by politicians of the
transformation and development systems is a sign of the current social
ills. It is easier to lay blame than it is to find the answer and
develop the cure.
Hopefully 1999 will be a year where the politicians learn that nothing
is to be gained by firebrand tactics.
Hopefully it will be a year where all will learn to work together for
the betterment of the sport and not egocentric belief.
A happy 1999 to all.
|