Day3: West Indies beat England by an innings and 93 runs
In 1976 it was Tony Greig's infamous but misinterpreted 'grovel' statement that turned the West Indies on to overwhelm England so convincingly in the
Test series then. In 2000, perhaps it was the fact that English bookmakers had written them off and that the home side were confidently expected to win the series that stirred them up.
Additional factors were perhaps the fact that this was the final tour of their great fast bowlers Curtly Ambrose and Courteney Walsh, and certainly the calm, efficient captaincy of Jimmy Adams. They made sure of the first Test with an overwhelming three-day victory by an innings and 93 runs.
The West Indies began the day with the clear aim of accumulating as many runs as possible on a pitch expected to deteriorate. Rose scored the first runs off the bat with a cut for four off Flintoff so well played as to give rise to thoughts that he may have the potential to become an all-rounder in the vein of Malcolm Marshall. Adams, on the other hand took
24 minutes to record his first runs of the day.
Rose failed to reach his fifty; on 48 he moved across his stumps to hit a full toss from Gough to leg and was given out lbw by umpire Srinivas Venkataraghavan, although the replay appeared to show it swinging down the leg side. West Indies were 354 for eight.
The West Indies play two number eleven batsmen and Reon King was the first of these to appear. He struggled for survival and Adams now found it
necessary to try to shield him from the strike. Adams now began to show glimpses of aggression, especially through the covers, and England decided to employ a sweeper there three-quarters of the way to the boundary. He was still not scoring quickly but he displayed a new stroke, a hook at a head-high bumper from Caddick down to long leg for two. Later, against the same bowler, came a unique 'hook' - he swatted down immaculately on a short ball on his legs almost like a 'reverse late cut', to send it running smoothly for four to fine leg.
Then King (1) stepped forward to have a swing against Croft and, after reference to the third umpire, was given out stumped by Stewart with his toe on the line, but not over as the law requires. West Indies were 385 for nine, with Courtney Walsh in and Adams needing 11 more runs for his century.
Walsh held firm as Adams sped through the nineties, scoring eight runs off three balls, but he was not destined to reach a century on this occasion. On 98 he lashed into the covers, but Flintoff dived to his right to hold a fine catch just on the ground - in fact, the television replay seemed to suggest that the ball may have bounced immediately in front of the
fielder. Adams was satisfied it was clean though, and walked off having batted for 391 minutes and faced 299 balls. The West Indies were all out for 397, a lead of 218, and lunch was taken.
Within half an hour after lunch, England were tumbling headlong towards a three-day defeat. Walsh bowled Ramprakash a ball short of a length which perhaps did not get up as high as he expected; stuck on the pad, he was given out lbw by umpire Venkat without a run on the board.
The first run came when Atherton cut, without timing it well, a ball from Walsh through the small gap between third slip and gully, one of them getting a hand to it, but the batsmen took a single. No further runs came until the fifth over when Nasser Hussain gloved a lifter from Ambrose; Lara at first slip got his hands to the chance above his head but the ball
bounced off and flew for four runs. Two balls later a delivery kept low and Hussain, chopping down on it just in the nick of time, managed to slice the ball past third slip for another four. Then Atherton clipped Walsh neatly off his toes for a four to deep square leg.
But the struggle was obviously intense. Hussain's technique failed him, as he sparred at a ball from Walsh outside his off stump and sent a regulation catch to the keeper; out for 8, and England now 14 for two. Then Graeme Hick was dismissed controversially for the first pair of his career, without addition to the score; trying to avoid contact with a delivery from
Walsh, umpire Venkat fired him out caught at the wicket, although the television replay appeared to show he had not made contact and the batsman himself appeared to be astounded.
Alec Stewart was more fortunate, off the mark straight away by turning the ball past square leg for two. Atherton defiantly cut Rose for four as Ambrose rested and the pressure was automatically released several notches. Stewart (8), however, did not benefit from the change; unleashing a dashing cut, he succeeded only in chopping the ball on to his stumps and England
were facing, not for the first time in recent years, utter disaster and humiliation.
It was a superb assault by the West Indian bowlers, but the batsmen seemed to have no answer to them apart from desperate, dogged and unconvincing defence. Stewart, the only batsman to consider counter-attack
as an option, had perished quickly. Atherton and Nick Knight shut up shop until Walsh rested after conceding 10 runs in 10 overs for three wickets. Test cricket's oldest and most successful pacemen was even now enjoying one of the finest matches of his career.
Runs came more freely for a brief spell, as King bowled much less accurately than his seniors, but England flattered briefly only to deceive. Atherton (19) departed in similar fashion to Stewart, cutting at King and dragging the ball on to his stumps. England were 60 for five.
Flintoff enjoyed some good fortune, a checked stroke against Rose lobbing over midwicket but with enough force behind it to carry for four. However, he then played a superb classic drive through extra cover for four. Even so, England went in to tea on 71 for five (Knight 18, Flintoff 8), leaving the administrators facing a blank or badly devalued Sunday.
King continued the West Indian attack after tea, perhaps solely as a reward for his fortuitous dismissal of Atherton, but he soon struck gold.
Flintoff (12) was the man to go, beaten and bowled by a fine ball that ripped back in on him, and England were now 78 for six and looking unlikely to last the day. Croft (1) looked determined, but when he tried a forcing stroke against King he only succeeded in getting a thick inside edge, and Wavell Hinds at short leg picked up a superb diving catch; England 83 for
seven.
King had taken three wickets in quick succession but was flattered by his figures, often pitching too short or wide but moving the ball back in sharply to the right-hander at times. Knight played the occasional drive, especially through the covers, as Walsh returned for King.
Caddick (4) fought hard for a long time, but eventually, playing back to Rose, he was given out caught at short leg by Hinds off Rose by umpire
Shepherd. The replay appeared to show that the ball hit his pad, then his bat, but was not so clear on whether Hinds, who juggled the ball several times before lying on his back and clasping it to his chest, had caught it cleanly; possibly just one finger may have kept it from hitting the ground as he first made contact with it. Caddick was most reluctant to walk, but England were 96 for eight.
Gough came in, to be greeted by a bouncer; the West Indians had obviously not forgotten his bowling at Ambrose the previous evening. He won great applause when an ungainly drive resulted in the ball flying off the thick edge to third man for four. He had a lucky escape when he fended off a bouncer from Walsh with his glove, the ball being caught in the slips -
but umpire Venkat, who had a bad day, ruled it not out. Reaching the other end, Gough pulled Rose handsomely for four.
Batting now began to look much easier than at any time during the innings, helped no doubt when Chris Gayle and then Jimmy Adams came on to bowl. Yet Adams achieved the breakthrough by dismissing Knight (34), given out caught by Hinds at short leg by umpire Venkat, the ball perhaps hitting pad and glove. England were nearly gone at 117 for nine, and it remains to be seen whether Knight did enough to preserve his Test place.
Gough (23) scored a few more runs, not in his lusty style, before Adams brought the match to a conclusion with a slow yorker that bowled Giddins without scoring. It was another three-day Test for Edgbaston, but the pitch was not really the villain of the piece this time, although it had given some help to bowlers on the first day. It was more the old familiar story
of superb West Indian bowling, especially by Walsh and Ambrose, and just two more inadequate batting performances by England.