Form and history do not favour England
Partab Ramchand - 18 November 2001
Nasser Hussain has this happy knack of saying the right thing at the
right time. The 33- year-old Indian born England captain has earned a
few PR points on arrival in India with his not so highly rated squad.
And he has also not wasted much time in putting the pressure on India.
Cheerily admitting that England were the underdogs in the ensuing Test
series, Hussain has cleverly named India as the favourites, which
means that the media and public will be gunning for the home team if
they fail to win the series.
Even a close look at the England squad, will not set the pulses of
Indian cricket fans in India racing. There are very few well-known
names, but even among them, there is no match-winner or a player
likely to draw crowds. In the past even if the England teams were
rather ordinary, there were dominant personalities like Dexter,
Barrington, Lock, Underwood, Knott, Greig, Gower, Botham, Boycott,
Gatting and Hick who attracted considerable attention among the India
media and the public.
|
Most of his statements have carried the "we have come to learn"
refrain. "To bowl to guys like Sachin Tendulkar, Sourav Ganguly and
Venkatsai Laxman, and face Anil Kumble and Harbhajan Singh will be a
good education," he said. "With a young team like this, beating India
in their own backyard is a huge challenge. There's a big difference in
the game in India. It will take a lot of effort by the younger lads to
get used to it." No big talk, no tall promises. Just very matter of
fact and strategically disarming.
Indeed, both current form and past history would seem to be against an
England win. At home, India have always been a formidable side against
any opposition, a fact driven home by the great triumph over Australia
earlier this year. And England on the face of it, are several notches
below the Australians as the Ashes contest this summer in England
proved.
Even a close look at the England squad, will not set the pulses of
Indian cricket fans in India racing. There are very few well-known
names, but even among them, there is no match-winner or a player
likely to draw crowds. In the past even if the England teams were
rather ordinary, there were dominant personalities like Dexter,
Barrington, Lock, Underwood, Knott, Greig, Gower, Botham, Boycott,
Gatting and Hick who attracted considerable attention among the India
media and the public. In the present squad there are hardly any names
that can be taken in the same breath. To a certain extent, Hussain
because of his Indian background, Butcher because of his one heroic
knock in the Ashes series, and a few others like Trescothick, Thorpe,
Ramprakash and White may attract some attention. But the other team
members are, generally speaking, the faceless and nameless ones.
Of course, India is a great place for nobodies to come good and that
is an encouraging thought for the Englishmen. One remembers a certain
John Lever coming here in 1976-77 as a reserve seam bowler and then
taking ten wickets on his Test debut at New Delhi to star in the first
of three successive victories before emerging as man of the series.
History though is against Hussain. Out of nine campaigns by England
teams in India over the past 68 years (if one ignores the Golden
Jubilee Test played in 1979-80), only three have been victorious.
Jardine in 1933-34, Greig in 1976-77 and Gower in 1984-85 held their
head high at the end of the tour and the last two triumphs were
achieved against the odds. It will certainly be an unexpected result
if Hussain is able to hold his head high at the end of the three-Test
series. It is more likely that he will join Dexter, Lewis, Fletcher
and Gooch as England captains who have lost Test rubbers in India. The
contests in 1951-52 and 1963-64 were shared.
Like so many England teams in the past, this one too is not at full
strength. The absence of Stewart, Gough, Caddick and Croft will
undoubtedly be felt but Hussain has turned this to an advantage by
saying that the young team is eager to do well. "The enthusiasm is
terrific and everyone is doubly keen to perform," he said on arrival.
Indeed, the unknown quantity could well become the team's strength if
the Indians display even the slightest touch of over confidence. For
that matter, one recalls that Lewis' team in 1972-73 and Gower's squad
of 12 years later were not rated highly. But while the latter turned a
0-1 deficit to win the Test series the only team to come back and
win in India Lewis' unheralded team surprised a cocky Indian side in
the first Test before going down by slender margins in the next two
games to lose the rubber narrowly.
The script at the start of the series is not likely to be different
from what happened in 1992-93. That time, the Indians came back from a
none too successful series in South Africa but found the England team
easy prey and won all three Test matches, two of them by an innings.
This time too the Indians are bound to come back from an unsuccessful
tour of South Africa. Whether the rest of the script follows the
pattern of nine years ago remains to be seen.
© Cricinfo
Teams
|
England,
India.
|
Players/Umpires
|
Nasser Hussain,
Anil Kumble,
Harbhajan Singh,
Sourav Ganguly,
Sachin Tendulkar,
David Gower,
Ian Botham,
Geoff Boycott,
Mike Gatting,
Marcus Trescothick,
Graham Thorpe,
Mark Ramprakash,
Darren Gough,
Andy Caddick,
Alec Stewart.
|
Tours
|
England in India
|