Indian think tank must take damage control measures quickly
Erapalli Prasanna - 24 July 2001
The Coca-Cola Cup tri-series took off on a wrong note for India as
they lost their opening matches to New Zealand and Sri Lanka. I had
mentioned in my last column that India had a chance if they could
handle Muralitharan. I am afraid the way the batsmen fared against a
limited New Zealand attack in the pipe opener made one wonder what is
wrong with them.
Ganguly and Dravid, the two senior players, have to take the blame for
the 84-run drubbing. Our batting revolves around both of them; the
rest of the batsmen are not yet established enough to pose even a
psychological advantage. The way Dravid got out gave me the impression
that he struggles to get runs if the bowling is tidy in length and
directed on the off stump or thereabouts. He has to develop the art of
playing with soft hands to rotate the strike.
As far as Ganguly is concerned, he has to take the bowling by the
scruff of the neck and open up like Jayasuriya. Fortune favours the
adventurous. He has shown a weakness around the rib cage and also
fishes around outside the off stump. Ganguly is a classy batsman, no
doubt, and I hope he does not encourage the opinion that is forming
among followers of the game that both he and Dravid can only play well
if Tendulkar is around to tame the attack and take the pressure off
them.
The bowling now revolves around Harbhajan who choked the runs on a
soft turner but his mettle will be tested on wickets which are not as
responsive. It was nice to see the two left armers Ashish Nehra and
Zaheer Khan bowling in tandem but they have still to develop the art
of bowling with the old ball. The Indian think-tank had a lot of
homework to do after the humiliating defeat and one of the solutions
they arrived at was to shuffle the batting order for the next game
against Sri Lanka.
Despite all the tinkering, this batting line-up remains highly
fragile. The Khurasiya-Yuvraj pairing never seemed like providing a
good start from where Ganguly and Dravid could pick up the threads.
Ganguly looks comfortable down the order but I believe a question mark
still hangs over his technique to counter class spinners. Dravid
spends too much time in the middle for too little returns and does not
possess the ability to keep the board ticking and raise the tempo at
the crunch. On the contrary, Laxman is one batsman who likes to play
his shots with abandon, irrespective of the situation and I feel that
he should be opening the innings.
Both New Zealand and Sri Lanka are confident if they merely put up 200
plus scores against India. Since the batsmen can't chase even modest
targets, the onus is on our bowlers to skittle out their opponents for
less than 150 to feel confident of winning. But the bowling has shown
a lack of depth and imagination to keep the rate of scoring down. The
only bowler who looks like getting respect is Harbhajan. Frequent
bowling of his faster deliveries however may result in Harbhajan
losing his main bowling forte, the off break.
The strategy of New Zealand and Sri Lanka is quite obvious: to play
Harbhajan and get around 30 plus runs off him. If he concedes more, it
is a bonus but if they play him out without losing too many wickets,
they are in business. The rest of the bowlers are not that consistent
either in line or length. If the think tank does not take damage
control measures quickly, prospects do not bode well for the Indian
side. Unless the rub of the green turns in their favour, India will
struggle to qualify for the final.
© CricInfo