CricInfo365. Daily cricket news from all over the world in your mailbox, free!
Statement from Alan Crompton
CricInfo365
9 January 1999
The following is excerpted from the statement of Alan Crompton
submitted to the Lahore High Court hearing in Melbourne today:
``Between October, 1960 and September, 1997 I was a member of the Board
of Directors of the Australian Cricket Board (ACB) and was its
Chairman between September, 1992 and September, 1995.
On 27th February, 1995, I informed Mr Shane Warne (Mr Warne) that the
ACB had decided to impose a fine of $ 8000 following his admission
that he accepted $ US 5000 from a bookmaker known to him as ``John'' in
Sri Lanka in September, 1994. The relevant circumstances were:
- In mid February, 1995 Mr Graham Halbish, the Chief Executive Officer
of the ACB (Mr Halbish) informed me that he was aware of rumours that
an Australian player may have had some contact with a bookmaker;
- at this time, the Australian team was on tour in New Zealand;
- Mr Halbish and I agreed to request Mr Ian McDonald, the Manager of
the Australian team in New Zealand (Mr McDonald), to privately
interview each member of the Australian team in New Zealand with a
view to determining whether any player had been in contact with a
bookmaker;
- in late February, 1995 Mr Halbish informed me that Mr McDonald had
reported to him that his inquiries revealed that two players, namely
Mr Warne and Mr Mark Waugh (Mr Waugh) volunteered that they had each
accepted sums of money from a bookmaker in Sri Lanka in September,
1994;
- I arranged with Mr Halbish to interview the players concerned in
Sydney upon their return from New Zealand during a two day stopover
before their departure to the West Indies on 28th February, 1995;
- my interview of Mr Warne took place in the Sydney Airport Parkroyal
Hotel on 27th February, 1995 in the presence of Mr Halbish and Mr
McDonald. Mr Warne admitted that he had accepted $ US 5000 from a
bookmaker who he knew as ``John'' in Sri Lanka during the Singer Trophy
cricket tournament in September, 1994. He disclosed all relevant
matters in relation to his acceptance of that sum and I satisfied
myself that his conduct amounted to a breach of his players contract
in that it brought the game of cricket into disrepute. I was satisfied
with Mr Warne's explanation that he provided only weather and pitch
condition information to the bookmaker. Mr Warne was open and
co-operative;
- following the interview I met with Mr Halbish and Mr McDonald. Mr
Halbish and I determined that the appropriate penalty was for Mr Warne
to be fined $ A 8000. Mr McDonald played no part in determining the
penalty; and
- later that day, I met again with Mr Warne in the presence of Mr
Halbish and Mr McDonald and I informed Mr Warne of the decision of the
ACB to impose the fine. Mr Warne accepted the ACB decision.
On 27th February, 1995 I informed Mr Waugh that the ACB had decided to
impose a fine of $ 10,000 following his admission that he accepted $
6000 (I understood this to be in US dollars) from a bookmaker known to
him as ``John'' in Sri Lanka in September, 1994.
- my interview of Mr Waugh took place in the Sydney Airport Parkroyal
Hotel on 27th February, 1995 in the presence of Mr Halbish and Mr
McDonald. Mr Waugh informed me that he had accepted $ 6000 from a
bookmaker who he knew as ``John'' in Sri Lanka during the Singer Trophy
cricket tournament in September, 1994. He disclosed all relevant
matters in relation to his acceptance of that sum and I satisfied
myself that his conduct amounted to a breach of his players contract
in that it brought the game of cricket into disrepute. I was similarly
satisfied with Mr Waugh's explanation and his co- operation;
- following the interview I met with Mr Halbish and Mr McDonald. Mr
Halbish and I determined that the appropriate penalty was for Mr Waugh
to be fined $ A 10,000. Mr McDonald played no part in determining the
penalty. I determined that this higher fine was appropriate because of
Mr Waugh's admission that he had accepted a sum greater than that of
Mr Warne and that he had more frequent contact with the bookmaker; and
- later that day, I met again with Mr Waugh in the presence of Mr
Halbish and Mr McDonald and I informed Mr Waugh of the decision of the
ACB to impose the fine. Mr Waugh accepted the ACB decision.
Immediately after informing Mr Warne and Mr Waugh, I informed Mr Jack
Edwards (Mr Edwards), an ACB Director, of the imposition of fines on
Mr Warne and Mr Waugh for two reasons;
- as Team Manager to the West Indies he should be aware in case there
were any internal ramifications arising from the action the ACB had
taken against the two players; and
- the actions of Mr Halbish and myself were to be reported to the ACB
Directors' meeting to take place the next day and Mr Edwards would
otherwise have been denied the opportunity to register any agreement
or disagreement with this action at that meeting because by that time
he would have departed with the team.
I also informed Mr Mark Taylor immediately because the action taken
involved two members of his team.
On 28th February, 1995 in Sydney I chaired a meeting of the Board of
the ACB. The action taken was reported to the ACB with 12 of the 14
Directors present at the time, the absent Directors being Mr Edwards
and Mr Bill Jocelyn who had had to leave the meeting early. The action
taken by Mr Halbish and myself was approved by the Board. No Director
present expressed any disagreement with the action taken, and no
Director thereafter, certainly until I ceased to be a Director in
September, 1997, expressed any disagreement with the action taken, the
penalties imposed, or the fact that the action taken was not made
public.
It was my view then and still is that the fines were severe and
appropriate in the circumstances. I was satisfied that neither player
had engaged in bribery or match fixing. The fines imposed were, to the
best of my knowledge, the largest monetary fines ever imposed on any
cricket players anywhere in the world, and I believe that that is
still the case today.
The ACB policy at the time was that matters of player behaviour and
disciplining of players (other than for on-field behaviour) are dealt
with privately and internally, and that where penalties are imposed
they are imposed privately and internally. The conduct of the players
fell into this category and the Board's policy was simply implemented.
In addition, the players were being dealt with under a private
contract between the ACB and the player and were considered to have
breached that private contract.
My concern on behalf of the ACB was that if, contrary to policy, this
matter was made public, the public may wrongly suspect or believe that
the players had been guilty of conduct beyond that which has been
revealed, which I was totally satisfied was not the case in either
instance. Public disclosure in these circumstances would, in my view,
have been grossly unfair to the players. This, in my view, was the
reason for the Board's policy in the first place.
The ACB did not advise the Pakistan Cricket Board of its actions
against Mr Warne and Mr Waugh for the following reasons:
- the matter was a separate issue. The matters under investigation by
the ACB of Mr Warne and Mr Waugh had nothing to do with the matters
under investigation in Pakistan which related to allegations of
bribery and match fixing. By way of contrast, the matters under
investigation by the ACB of Mr Warne and Mr Waugh concerned acts,
which while clearly wrong, had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do
with bribery or match fixing; and
- the matter was considered to be a private matter between the ACB and
the players resulting from the breach of private contracts between the
ACB and each player.''
Source: CricInfo365
Feedback on this article can be forwarded to CricInfo365 at editor@cricinfo.com