TOUR
· Front Page
· Scorecards &
Reports
· Averages
· News Articles
· Photographs
SQUADS
· England
· South Africa
GROUNDS
· Bloemfontein
· Benoni
· Cape Town
· Centurion
· Durban
· East London
· Johannesburg
· Kimberley
· Port Elizabeth
CRICINFO
· Homepage
· South Africa
· England
· Index
|
|
CricInfo runs on
Tour History
by Dave Liverman (wgg@cricinfo.com)
Part 4 of 5: A Political Interlude | Forward to Part 5 - The 1990s
Cricket can never be totally divorced from the society and
culture in which the game is played, and the next 30 years of
England-South Africa cricketing history is more about politics
than cricket. The South African racially based policy of
apartheid had led to their departure from the Commonwealth, and
increasing sporting isolation. South Africa had never played
India, Pakistan or the West Indies, and neither were they welcome
to tour those countries. The policy extended to sport, where the
Prime Minster BJ Vorster explicitly stated in 1967 that mixed
race sporting events would not be sanctioned.
1968-69
The white-only nature of top-class cricket in South Africa had
proved to be an insurmountable obstacle to Basil D'Oliveira, a
"Cape Coloured" player from Cape Town. His immense abilities were
restricted to minor cricket in his home country, but he earned
enough notice that he was offered an opportunity to play league
cricket in England. He made an immediate impact in the Lancashire
League, and qualified for Worcestershire at the age of thirty. He
made his England debut in 1966, and was in and out of the side
over the next few years. It was clear that he may well be in the
England party set to tour South Africa in 1968-69, and in the
spring of that year the MCC wrote to the SACA requesting that no
conditions be set on their choice of players New Zealand had
cancelled a rugby tour the previous year after objections were
raised to the presence of Maori players in the side. No answer
was received to the enquiry, but the situation appeared to
resolve itself as D'Oliveira had trouble making the Test side
against the Australians that summer. Injuries to several
established players led to his call up for the crucial final Test
at the Oval, and he seized his opportunity with both hands,
making a century of high class, as well as grabbing a crucial
wicket on the thrilling final day. To many observers, this
performance under pressure made him an automatic choice for the
tour.
The selectors, meeting that evening, always maintained that the
political implications of their choices never entered their
minds, but the team, as approved by the MCC committee, excluded
D'Oliveira. Whatever the true reasons, the public consensus was
that his omission reflected a concession to South African wishes,
and the MCC were summoned to a special general meeting by
discontented members. Two weeks later, Cartwright withdrew from
the party through injury, and D'Oliveira was named in his place.
Any doubts that the selectors were bowing to politcal pressure in
this decision were augmented by their original statement that
D'Oliveira was rejected from the original squad because he was
considered a batsman yet he was included at the expense of a
bowler. The South African Government, through their Prime
Minsiter Vorster, said that they were not prepared to accept the
English tourists, as the team had been forced upon them with
"certain political aims".
The MCC formally cancelled the tour, but the special general
meeting still went ahead. Three resolutions were put forward,
expressing regret at the MCC Committee's handling of the tour
selection, and proposing that no further tours take place until
progress towards non-racial cricket was made in South Africa. The
Rev. David Sheppard (who had refused to play against the South
Africans in 1960) and Mike Brearley spoke for the resolutions,
and the meeting was attended by over 1000 members. The vote was
close at the meeting, but the motions were overwhelmingly
defeated by the postal votes.
The man at the centre of the furore, D'Oliveira himself,
maintained throughout a calm dignity. It later became known that
he had been offered over the summer a considerable sum of money
to coach in South Africa that winter, thereby making him
unavailable for the touring party. It was also made known that,
even if he had been picked in the initial squad, the South
African Government would have found his presence unacceptable. In
such circumstances, he was one of the few who emerged from the
affair with his reputation enhanced.
1970 [Scorecards]
A consequence of the MCC special meeting was that as far as the
MCC were concerned, cricket relations would proceed as normal.
Consequently, an invitation was extended to the South Africans to
send a team to England in 1970. The itinerary of 5 Tests was
announced in September of 1969, but with the D'Oliveira affair
fresh in everyone's minds, it did not pass un-noticed. The
Minister of Sport, Denis Howell fired the first salvo a month
later, suggested that the team should "stay away from Britain".
The SACA immediately re-stated their intention to tour, and the
Cricket Council supported their intention. A South African rugby
team toured Britain that winter, and was the focus off well
organized demonstrations, and disruptions of the games by
anti-apartheid groups. A young South African student living in
England, Peter Hain, set up the "Stop the Seventy Tour" committee
in September 1969, and this group became the focus of opposition
to the cricket tour. The threats to disrupt tour games became a
major concern, as the police presence required at the rugby games
grew, and demonstrations erupted into sporadic violence. As more
and more groups came out in opposition to the tour, the SACA and
TCCB frantically maneuvered in an attempt to keep the tour alive.
The SACA stated that future South African sides would be selected
on merit alone. Many county grounds were vandalised in a
coordinated effort in January, and the TCCB, realising the
impossibility of providing adeuqate security for a full tour
curtailed the programme to 12 matches. An all white side was
announced by the SACA, and the British Prime Minister, Harold
Wilson went on record as saying that that MCC had made a mistake
in invitng the tourists, as well as pointing out that people
should be free to demonstrate against apartheid. This might well
have been the point at which the TCCB could have withdrawn
gracefully, but as the cricket season started in April, the tour
was still on. Thirteen African countries threatened to withdraw
from the Commonwealth Games (held in Edinburgh that summer) if
the tour was to continue, and the House of Commons had an
emergency debate on the issue. The governing Labour party were
clearly in opposition to the tour, and they were joined by a wide
spectrum of society. At this critical moment came the news that
South Africa had been expelled from the Olympic movement. With
two weeks to go before the tour, the Cricket Council re-affirmed
its stance that the tour should go ahead, and may well have had
the majority of public opinion on its side. The sorry tale came
to a climax when Jim Callaghan, the Home Secretary, formally
asked the Cricket Council to cancel the tour, on the grounds of
broad public policy. In such circumstances, the Cricket Council
had little alternative, and the tour was cancelled.
A hastily put together Rest of the World side filled the Test
spots, and was a great success. Captained by a West Indian, Gary
Sobers, the side contained several South African players, and
ironically, the highlight of the matches for many, was the
enthralling sight of the two great left-handed batsmen of their
generation, Sobers and Graeme Pollock, putting the English
bowling to the sword at the Oval.
Official Test matches were not to resume for a quarter of a
century. South Africa became isolated from official world
cricket, and their best players became cricketing mercenaries,
plying their trade on the English county circuit. Some of the
greatest players in their history had little opportunity to
display their abilities at the highest level notably Barry
Richards, who may have been better than his West Indian namesake,
Mike Procter, a superb all rounder, and Graeme Pollock. This has
to be balanced against the lack of opportunity for the non-white
majority, who had no access to the opportunities and facilities
afforded to the minority it will never be known what talent
withered in the townships during this period.
The Rebel Tours
The sporting isolation of South Africa, and the aftermath of the
Packer affair, led to a series of "rebel" tours. These consisted
of unofficial touring teams, consisting of Test or near Test
class players who were willing to incur the wrath of official
cricket in their home countries by participating in these events.
The financial inducements were substantial but the rebels
received bans ranging from 3 years to life. The 5 day games were
treated as official Tests by the South Africans at the time, but
have no such status (they are, however, considered first-class).
The first such tour was by an English XI, led by Graham Gooch,
who played three one day games and three "Tests". Procter
captained the South Africans, and they won the one-day series
3-0. The first Test was one sided- Jimmy Cook made a century in
his first international match, and with Richards, Pollock and
Peter Kirsten topping 50, declared on 400. van der Bijl showed
his class with 5 wickets, and the English XI followed on. Gooch
made a fine hundred, but van der Bijl took another 5 wickets,
well supported by Garth le Roux, and the south Africans needed
only 37 to win. The second match was played at Cape Town, and was
drawn. Little separated the sides on first innings, Gooch
top-scoring for the England XI, and Peter Kirsten making a
painstaking hundred for the South Africans (John Lever taking
6/86). With little but practice to aim for, the English bats were
on top in the 2nd innings, Larkins making 95, but in a rain
affected match, even a declaration with 3 wickets down could not
produce a result. The third match was ruined by rain, the entire
3rd day being lost. The English XI made a good start, having the
home side at 111/6, but Kourie and Jennings staged a rear-guard
action, and Richards declared after rain intervened. The English
XI batted attractively, notably Woolmer with a century, but when
Gooch declared there was only four hours left for play, and the
match petered out to a draw.
All the English participants received three year bans from
official Test cricket for their part in the tour. For some, at
the end of their careers (such as Boycott, Knott and Underwood),
this made little difference, but for others it marked a lengthy
interruption to their international careers.
1989-90
A second tour took place in 1989-90, under similar auspices to
the 1981-82 tour- there had been tours by rebel West Indian and
Sri Lankan XIs in the meantime, in this case resulting in
lifetime bans from their countries. This time the English XI was
led by Mike Gatting, discarded as English captain, and supported
by possibly a weaker squad than the previous team. Most of the
squad consisted of players with a few Tests or on the verge of
test selection rather than established stars. The put up a poor
performance in the only full length match against the South
Africans, losing by 7 wickets at the Wanderers. Donald and Snell
took 4 wickets each as they were dismissed for 156, then Kuiper's
84 gave the South Africans a respectable lead. The Englishman
could only muster 122 at their second attempt, and the south
Africans won easily. Four one day matches were also staged, and
these were one-sided, the south Africans winning the series 3-1.
They won the first three games with almost embarrassing ease,
against a side supposedly experienced in one-day cricket. In the
first match de Villiers bowled economically, and the home side
had little trouble passing a modest target of 218, the captain
Cook top-scoring with 73. The second match was close, the margin
of victory being only 14 runs. A good all-round batting effort
saw the South Africans make 219, and Barnett and Athey had the
English XI off to a good start, but they fell behind the
run-rate, and wickets tumbled. The 3rd match can best be
described as a thrashing. Thanks to 73 from Cook and a century
from Kuiper, the home side topped 300. Athey contributed 50, but
no other batsman made more than 7 (and that was the number
eleven) the South Africans won by 207 runs. The English XI won
the final game, thanks to a hundred from Barnett, and an unlikely
bowling hero, Gatting taking 6/26.
Many of the South African players in this series were soon to
become familiar names as the winds of change were blowing.
Political upheavals in the country led to black majority rule,
and the end of apartheid. South Africa were welcomed back into
the international fold with an historic Test against the West
Indies in 1992, and the stage was set for a resumption of
official matches with England.
|