|
|
Berry S: Eng schedule looms as a vision from hell (24Jul94)
TCCB's seventh Test heaven looms as a vision from hell
Scyld Berry laments the economic priorities which are shaping
England's programme
Visionaries have recently proposed that two divisions of Test
cricket be created, the prospect of promotion and relegation ad-
ding to the inherent interest of a series. But a division of the
Test-playing countries into two sections has already happened -
based on money, not merit. As is evident from the crowds of
28,000 at Lord's over the first three days, England's Tests
against South Africa are major league money-spinners. So are the
Tests against Australia and West Indies, while Pakistan's tours
of England are big money, as long as they have brilliant fast
bowlers. In the second division, along with New Zealand and In-
dia, come Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe, minnows so small that England
keep them at arm's length. Sri Lanka have been given five one-off
Tests in 12 years to aid their development. Zimbabwe? Forget it.
"There are gaps to be filled in," according to the TCCB, on the
subject of England's future programme, but the small fry will be
lucky to squeeze in. The hard-nosed new fact is that England are
now selecting their opponents on commercial grounds. In the days
of MCC's control, there used to be some belief that England had a
duty to foster the game worldwide. Now the only question appears
to be "how much?" Take India, perhaps the opponents with whom
England have been best matched over the last two decades. Just
like a nice cup of Darjeeling tea: not too strong - no nasty
quick bowlers - and not too weak. Yet in the space of 12 years,
from 1990 to 2002 at the earliest, India will play three Tests in
England. In response the TCCB says that it has to bear in mind
the interests of its constituent members, the first-class coun-
ties, as well as those of other Test-playing countries. Point
taken; but the pendulum is swinging too far. Now that the TCCB
can bring in @10 million annually from England's Test cricket,
the counties' existence is not in danger and there is scope for
wider concerns. Yet the future has been shaped on other lines.
The traditional pattern of playing Australia every four years
home and away is sacrosanct, and rightly. The modern pattern of
treating West Indies similarly is not wholly desirable, but lu-
crative tours to England are central to the very survival of West
Indian cricket. Still, within these limits, England should ar-
range its schedule more equitably. Next summer, for instance,
West Indies are to play six Tests here, "as an experiment", to
gratify the plea by each of our Test grounds for a Test match.
Only Australia have before played a six-Test series here, and an
unsatisfying arrangement it is from every viewpoint except the
financial, since five is the correct length for a full series. It
also means that Sri Lanka do not get their quadrennial sop of a
one-off Test. To accommodate everybody, the TCCB says that con-
sideration is being given to staging a seventh Test in September.
Ye gods, spare us: a fairer distribution, not more cricket, is
wanted. Touring Pakistan is another matter, given the prickly na-
ture of England's last visit in 1987-88 - all right, of most Eng-
land visits. At least a dozen years will pass between Mike
Gatting's tour and England's next. This objective of maximising
income can run directly counter to England's interests on the
field. It was unfortunate that in the calendar year of 1990 Eng-
land had to undertake the two hardest tours, to the West Indies
and Australia, as it made for a year's solid cricket except for a
three-week rest in October. By the end, a good trio of pace
bowlers had been lost: Devon Malcolm exhausted, Gladstone Small
burnt-out for ever as an England bowler, and Angus Fraser crocked
for the next two years and more. To arrange exactly the same
schedule for this year was careless: already, no more than half-
way through, England's main pace bowlers in the West Indies are
keeling or have temporarily keeled over. To have the same
schedule in four years' time is lunatic. This isn't cricket. It's
business. And the purpose in playing smaller fry is not altogeth-
er altruistic; if England did so more often, they might even win
some Test series.
ENGLAND'S INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME 1994-95.- Overseas: Australia.
1995.- Home: West Indies. 1995-96.- Overseas: South Africa, World
Cup (India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka). 1996.- Home: India/Pakistan.
1996-97.- Overseas: New Zealand. 1997.- Home: Australia. 1997-
98.- Overseas: West Indies. 1998.- Home: South Africa. 1998-99.-
Overseas: Australia. 1999.- Home: New Zealand, World Cup (Eng-
land). 1999-00.- To be arranged. 2000.- Home: West Indies. 2000-
01.- To be arranged. 2001.- Home: Australia. 2001-02.- To be ar-
ranged. 2002.- Overseas: Australia.
(Extracted from a Sunday Telegraph article)
Contributed by Vicky (VIGNESWA@*umass.edu)
|
|
|